Murmu Asks Supreme Court: 'How Can You Fix Deadline For President, Governors' Nod To Bills?'
Last Updated:May 15, 2025, 09:25 ISTPresident Droupadi Murmu connected Wednesday asked the apex tribunal however it could person fixed specified a ruling erstwhile the Constitution had nary specified stipulations.President Droupadi Murmu | File Image/PTIIn a crisp effect to the Supreme Court’s verdict connected fixing deadlines for the politician and the President to determine connected authorities Bills, President Droupadi Murmu connected Wednesday asked the apex tribunal however it could person fixed specified a ruling erstwhile the Constitution had nary specified stipulations.The President’s effect came aft the Supreme Court seat comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan, successful April, permitted judicial involution if Governors hold assent to legislative bills for an extended period. Additionally, the seat noted that the President indispensable instrumentality a determination wrong 3 months connected bills referred by Governors.Murmu connected Tuesday asked a fewer questions to the Supreme Court regarding its decisions regarding fixing deadlines for President and Governors motion for Bills:How tin the Supreme Court substitute the President /Governor’s powers nether the Constitution with its ain powers nether Article 142?Are states misusing the “plenary power" of the Supreme Court against the Centre?How tin a timeline beryllium prescribed for the President and Governor?What are the law options earlier a Governor erstwhile a Bill is presented to him nether Article 200 of the Constitution?The President mentioned Articles 200 and 201, applicable to Governors and the Presidentrespectively, and stated that they “do not stipulate immoderate clip framework oregon procedure" to beryllium followed by them portion considering the assistance oregon refusal of assent to a Bill passed by an Assembly.SC Placed President On A DeadlineIn April this year, the Supreme Court passed a judgement successful effect to a November 2023 petition filed by the Tamil Nadu authorities against the State’s Governor indefinitely withholding assent to 10 Bills passed by the authorities Assembly, immoderate arsenic aboriginal arsenic 2020.Delivering a verdict, the Supreme Court ruled that the President indispensable determine connected authorities Bills, reserved by Governors for Presidential assent, wrong 3 months. The Apex Court acceptable speech Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi’s determination to withhold assent to 10 pending Bills and ruled that the President should besides not instrumentality much than 3 months to present determination connected Bills referred by Governors.Location : First Published:News india Murmu Asks Supreme Court: 'How Can You Fix Deadline For President, Governors' Nod To Bills?'
Last Updated:May 15, 2025, 09:25 IST
President Droupadi Murmu connected Wednesday asked the apex tribunal however it could person fixed specified a ruling erstwhile the Constitution had nary specified stipulations.
President Droupadi Murmu | File Image/PTI
In a crisp effect to the Supreme Court’s verdict connected fixing deadlines for the politician and the President to determine connected authorities Bills, President Droupadi Murmu connected Wednesday asked the apex tribunal however it could person fixed specified a ruling erstwhile the Constitution had nary specified stipulations.
The President’s effect came aft the Supreme Court seat comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan, successful April, permitted judicial involution if Governors hold assent to legislative bills for an extended period. Additionally, the seat noted that the President indispensable instrumentality a determination wrong 3 months connected bills referred by Governors.
Murmu connected Tuesday asked a fewer questions to the Supreme Court regarding its decisions regarding fixing deadlines for President and Governors motion for Bills:
- How tin the Supreme Court substitute the President /Governor’s powers nether the Constitution with its ain powers nether Article 142?
- Are states misusing the “plenary power" of the Supreme Court against the Centre?
- How tin a timeline beryllium prescribed for the President and Governor?
- What are the law options earlier a Governor erstwhile a Bill is presented to him nether Article 200 of the Constitution?
The President mentioned Articles 200 and 201, applicable to Governors and the President
respectively, and stated that they “do not stipulate immoderate clip framework oregon procedure" to beryllium followed by them portion considering the assistance oregon refusal of assent to a Bill passed by an Assembly.
SC Placed President On A Deadline
In April this year, the Supreme Court passed a judgement successful effect to a November 2023 petition filed by the Tamil Nadu authorities against the State’s Governor indefinitely withholding assent to 10 Bills passed by the authorities Assembly, immoderate arsenic aboriginal arsenic 2020.
Delivering a verdict, the Supreme Court ruled that the President indispensable determine connected authorities Bills, reserved by Governors for Presidential assent, wrong 3 months. The Apex Court acceptable speech Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi’s determination to withhold assent to 10 pending Bills and ruled that the President should besides not instrumentality much than 3 months to present determination connected Bills referred by Governors.
Location : First Published:
News india Murmu Asks Supreme Court: 'How Can You Fix Deadline For President, Governors' Nod To Bills?'
What's Your Reaction?
